Agroline » カタログ » Volvo

Volvo

4.3

198件のレビュー

重要指標に基づくVolvoの平均評価

3.9

3.9 価格

4.5

4.5 信頼性

4.2

4.2 メンテナンス

4.6

4.6 作動

4.4

4.4 利便性

Volvoレビュー

すべてのレビューを読む

Volvoの平均スコア

4.3

(!) 重要: この評価はユーザーの評価およびレビューに基づくものであり、主観的な使用体験の影響を受けている可能性があります

3.9

価格

4.5

信頼性

4.2

メンテナンス

4.6

作動

4.4

利便性

レビューを追加

3.6

油圧ショベル Volvo EC 250

2016 年

4.0 価格

3.0 信頼性

3.0 メンテナンス

4.0 作動

4.0 利便性

自動的に翻訳されます

Short field note from a guy who's used a few EC250DLs. Fuel economy is a mixed bag - compared to older machines you'll save some, maybe ten to fifteen percent, but when you work it hard the consumption goes up. I've seen starting troubles tied to weak batteries and a couple of units threw sensor faults that needed diagnostics. Wiring corrosion shows up on older machines too. Undercarriage eats tracks on rough ground if you don't inspect rollers and idlers regularly. Controls are mostly responsive but when the hydraulic fluid runs hot you can feel a slight lag. The frame and build feel solid; with good care these will hit the reported large hour counts. My advice: keep a spare battery, budget for parts, and don't ignore warning lights.

さらに読む...

4.4

採石機械 Volvo A40

2008 年

4.0 価格

5.0 信頼性

4.0 メンテナンス

5.0 作動

4.0 利便性

自動的に翻訳されます

Had the chance to test the 2025 A40 at the quarry. Handles rough ground about as well as you'd expect from Volvo. The suspension and the ergonomics help a ton on long shifts, less tired at the end of the day. The big win for me is the real-time display in the cab, lets you keep an eye on stuff without fiddling with old buttons and dials. One gripe, I wish they’d figure out a better way to tweak the seating - it’s adjustable but never feels perfect for tall drivers. Reliability hasn’t been an issue so far. Didn’t see the pricing, but it’s probably not gonna be cheap given all the gear inside. Maintenance looks on par with older Volvos, so that’s fine.

さらに読む...

4.0

都市バス Volvo 8900

2012 年

3.0 価格

5.0 信頼性

4.0 メンテナンス

4.0 作動

4.0 利便性

自動的に翻訳されます

I've driven many buses, and the Volvo 8900 Electric stands out mainly for its advanced design and electric capabilities. I had the chance to try its shorter 12.3-meter version. First off, the seating layout with 43 seats is comfortable for passengers, though I felt the overall assembly weight at 20.6 tons slightly noticeable during maneuvering. The electric motor provides smooth performance, but I wish the charging port placement options were more universal. Overall, it has potential.

4.2

都市バス Volvo 8900

2016 年

4.0 価格

5.0 信頼性

4.0 メンテナンス

4.0 作動

4.0 利便性

自動的に翻訳されます

Just had a stint driving the Volvo 8900, and overall it's a decent setup. The low floor in city variants is convenient for quick passenger boarding, but I found the moderate height in the intercity version a bit cumbersome in certain schedule-tight scenarios. The diesel engine does its job, but it could offer a touch more power when fully loaded. Comfortable seating makes longer routes more pleasant for passengers.

4.8

採石機械 Volvo A40

2008 年

4.0 価格

5.0 信頼性

5.0 メンテナンス

5.0 作動

5.0 利便性

自動的に翻訳されます

Been running haulers for 20+ years. The A40 Electric ticks a lot of boxes for me. Battery is 350 kWh and Volvo say runtime is about 4-4.5 hrs in most jobs, up to 7 hrs if conditions are easy. Fast charging 350 kW gets 20-80% in around an hour, so you can keep a shift going if you plan charging slots. Cab is quiet with low vibration, better visibility and guided entry - actually makes long stints less tiring. Service access from the ground and claims of reduced wear sound good; less time on service stands is a real win. Controls feel modern too: Dynamic Drive, 100% diff locks, energy recovery on the retarder - all help on steep, loaded runs. Mixed feelings only about charging infrastructure - you need DC chargers on site or you’ll be stuck.

さらに読む...

すべてのレビューを読む (198)